Discussion about this post

User's avatar
BehaviorForecastsProbablyHard's avatar

Hmm.

I would usually make an argument about American usage, 'republic', and 'democracy', but it feels not relevant.

'democracy has failed' is basically a claim of someone for whom 'democracy' or a 'republic' always had strictly utilitarian value. They liked the policies, or they liked manipulating it into power.

Strictly speaking, theory describes the past, and the categories we label may not always be as absolute as we pretend. Types of government come from aggregating distinct situations, and for a given time, place and population, the trades between several may be pretty close. How angry persons are, how readily violent, and how able and willing they are to resolve disputes may be a bit relevant.

In a republic, or democracy, an army distributes political or government power among its soldiers. This is the pragmatic incentive, with no idealism. It assumes that the men of the population are also an army in control of the territory. The pragmatic virtue is that the result is probably not something that they would fight and die to stop, but see civil wars.

This is not something that extends to an international consensus among 'experts'. Different cultures pretty much cannot form the societal deals so perfectly that they could build a single functioning army. That democracy could serve the internationalist end was only plausible so long as the ensuing disputes and anger were not strong. The 'sustainable' policy was never truly sustainable, because it sought to inflict cost without compensation, and without any real grasp of what the food supply requires, nor that people will want to eat.

The other aspect of internationalism and democracy, is whether democracy at all exists where the population neither has enough arms and willingness to use, nor a very strong conviction of the ideals of democracy. Certainly, ideals are not uniform across the planet, so we should not expect uniform behavior.

Re: current problems.

I think there are answers, and some of them may even be really good.

We shall see about the results that these performers claim to be able to cause. They claimed, for example, that four years of Biden would be enough results for the emotional weight that they put on that goal.

In the US, the case of a clear easy Trump win, and senior bureaucrats attempting resistance, could be surprising. We do not entirely know how many of the people inside the US civil service really hated Biden's policies, or simply are eager to act on personal grudges. Dunno, we may see.

Future events are potentially very interesting, but also potentially something it would be healthier for me to ignore in favor of other interesting things.

Expand full comment
Kitsune, Maskless Crusader.'s avatar

History tells us that the people will not act until circling the drain.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts